The evidence standard
Every review ends with one of four verdicts. The standard is the same for every claim, whoever is selling it.
A verdict is not the same as an evidence tier. Tiers (A, B, C, Preclinical) describe how much human proof sits under one claim. A verdict summarizes the whole review.
Evidence reviews
Peptides, Decoded: What the Marketing Skips
What is known, what is unknown, what is marketed, and what is overstated.
Each review uses one structure: the claim, what the evidence supports, what it does not establish, who is selling it, questions worth taking to a qualified clinician, and a verdict.
From the ManopauseMD library
The books hold the argument. These pages carry what changes after publication: updates, contested claims, and new research.
Your Labs Are Normal: What That Result Can, and Cannot, Tell You
The foundational book: a normal result is not the whole story.
Peptides Decoded: Claim by Claim
A claim-by-claim evidence and safety-literacy companion.
Where the money stands
These reviews are editorial. None contains an affiliate link. If one ever does, the disclosure will sit at the point of recommendation, the evidence tier will sit beside it, the commercial relationship will be stated plainly, and no affiliate relationship will determine a verdict.
Dr. Michael Peters is a retired physician and does not practice medicine. Reviews are educational only, not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, and offer no personalized interpretation.